Arctic Exploitation

The silver lining to Arctic global warming

Russia’s deal with BP offers a model for how to best exploit scarce resources, writes Roger Howard.

Melting Ice in the North West Passage Photo: Getty

By Roger Howard

6:40PM GMT 17 Jan 2011

Comments159 Comments

In the Arctic Ocean as elsewhere, the full, destructive power of global warming appears unmistakable. Regional sea ice is retreating fast, threatening to raise global sea levels, destroy traditional habitats and ways of life, and accelerate the rate at which the planet as a whole is warming up.

Yet there is one silver lining to this depressing and disturbing picture. For when last week representatives of the Russian oil company Rosneft signed a “historic” new deal with BP, it was an indication that, in the years ahead, climate change will present a more complex picture than the darker image that is often drawn.

For some considerable time, experts have warned of the danger of “resource wars” as countries spar over diminishing resources of oil, natural gas and other commodities that will remain vital to sustain booming economies and soaring populations.

But the reality is that there will also be geopolitical, as well as commercial, opportunities and the possibility of rival governments working together more closely and healing their differences. BP and Rosneft are creating a joint venture – a “strategic global alliance” – that is designed to exploit the underwater petroleum reserves that are located in the Kara Sea, north of the Arctic Circle. Only now, as the sea ice retreats and the continental shelf is becoming more accessible, is this starting to become viable.

Far from being a recipe for confrontation, the likely presence of valuable natural resources in the Arctic region – perhaps on a massive scale – is prompting Russia to work with international partners.

The Russians lack the advanced engineering skills, particularly in exploiting deepwater oil and gas reserves, and are heavily dependent on the expertise of Western oil majors, which in turn desperately need to book reserves of future supplies to keep their investors happy.

It is this deal that should serve as a model for future interactions between Russia and foreign governments; not just the six other Arctic powers, such as Canada and the United States, but others, China and the EU member states among them, that lie far distant. For each of these governments has to recognise that it has a vested interest in avoiding confrontation in the Arctic region.

This is based partly on an altruistic and humanitarian concern to prevent accidents that could unleash environmental damage on a massive scale, similar to the Exxon Valdez disaster in March 1989, when an oil tanker ran aground in ice-laden waters.

But it also represents a strong material self-interest: in the Arctic, as elsewhere, the mere risk of confrontation over precious resources could easily send financial markets into panic, spiking the spot price of commodities in a way that would damage every consumer.

By contrast, the region’s resources can be exploited more successfully, as well as in a more environmentally friendly manner, if countries work together to pool their skills and expertise.

The mere threat of resource shortages should prompt us to exploit the remaining reserves to the full, not to fight over them. Besides commercial cooperation, there are other joint ventures in the Arctic that could tap this self-interest to help foster international harmony. Russia and Nato could work together to confront the mutual challenges in the waters of the Northeast Passage that runs along Russia’s northern coasts.

Since international shipping is just starting to make use of this route, working groups could also be established to tackle any prospective environmental disaster caused by collision, accidents and catastrophe.

In the coming decades, governments must recognise that it is in their interests to work together in the Arctic and to use regional climate change as an opportunity to help build the relationships between them.

Roger Howard is the author of ‘The Arctic Gold Rush: The New Race for Tomorrow’s Natural Resources’ (Continuum 2009)

Oil/Gas + Greed = Disturbing News for Arctic North

Industry launches Arctic spill-response effort

Some of the world’s biggest oil companies have launched a four-year, multi-million-dollar collaborative effort aimed at enhancing the industry’s ability to respond to and prevent Arctic oil spills as these new frontiers open up to development.

Luke Johnson  26 January 2012 18:43 GMT

“Prevention of oil spills is a priority for industry, as is the response to any spill that may occur,” programme manager Joseph Mullin said in a statement. “Spill-response research is an aspect of the oil business for which collaboration is imperative.”

Oil companies are increasingly exploring for hard-to-reach resources in Arctic regions in places such as Russia, Greenland and the US. Environmentalists fear a spill in such environmentally sensitive areas would be catastrophic and near-impossible to adequately clean up.

The programme announced on Thursday by members of the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP) will run tests and experiments and develop spill-response technology that will better prepare industry to deal with possible accidents, Mullin said.

The group of sponsors includes supermajors BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Shell and ExxonMobil, as well as major producers Eni, Statoil, and Total.

Each company is paying an equal share of about $2.4 million, said OGP spokesman John Campbell.

The programme, known as the Oil Spill Response Technology Joint Industry Programme (JIP), will address the unique challenges posed by punishing Arctic conditions, including prolonged periods of darkness, extreme cold, distant infrastructure, presence of sea ice offshore and a higher cost of doing business, the statement said.

Some of the research will focus on in dispersant use, in-situ burning, mechanical recovery, and remote sensing in Arctic conditions.

Work will involve several controlled-oil releases experiments in the field to verify research results. These field experiments will be contingent on approval from relevant authorities.

The programme was announced at the Arctic Frontiers Conference in Tromso, Norway, on Thursday.

The announcement came on the same day Norway and Russia launched a Nkr16 million ($2.7 million) bilateral project to develop new technology for exploitating of oil and gas resources in the Arctic.

Published: 26 January 2012 18:43 GMT  | Last updated: 26 January 2012 18:52 GMT

Arctic Climate – our future climate balance in peril?

Arctic climate change ‘to spark domino effect’

January 31, 2012

 

The rate of Arctic climate change was now faster than ecosystems and traditional Arctic societies could adapt to.

WA-based scientists have warned of “dire consequences” to the human race after detecting the first signs of dangerous climate change in the Arctic.

The scientists, from the University of WA, claim the region is fast approaching a series of imminent “tipping points” which could trigger a domino effect of large-scale climate change across the entire planet.

In a paper published in the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ journal AMBIO and Nature Climate Change, the lead author and director of UWA’s Oceans Institute, Winthrop Professor Carlos Duarte, said the Arctic region contained arguably the greatest concentration of potential tipping elements for global climate change.

Advertisement: Story continues below

“If set in motion, they can generate profound climate change which places the Arctic not at the periphery but at the core of the Earth system,” Professor Duarte said.  ”There is evidence that these forces are starting to be set in motion.”

“This has major consequences for the future of human kind as climate change progresses.”

Professor Duarte said the loss of Arctic summer sea ice forecast over the next four decades − if not before − was expected to have abrupt knock-on effects in northern mid-latitudes, including Beijing, Tokyo, London, Moscow, Berlin and New York.

Research showed that the Arctic was warming at three times the global average and the loss of sea ice – which had melted faster in summer than predicted − was linked tentatively to recent extreme cold winters in Europe.

Professor Duarte − winner of last year’s prestigious Prix d’Excellence awarded by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea − said the most dangerous aspect of Arctic climate change was the risk of passing critical “tipping points”.

In the next 10 years, Professor Duarte warned summer sea ice could be largely confined to north of coastal Greenland and Ellesmere Island, and was likely to disappear entirely by mid-century.

A drop in Arctic ice had opened new shipping routes, expanded oil, gas and mineral exploitation and led to new harbours, houses, roads, airports, power stations and other support facilities.

It had triggered a new gold rush to access these resources, with recent struggles by China, Brazil and India to join the Arctic Council where the split of these resources was being discussed.

But increased deposits of black carbon (soot) from coal-burning power stations had accelerated warming and ice melt.

Professor Duarte said the rate of Arctic climate change was now faster than ecosystems and traditional Arctic societies could adapt to.

The Arctic was expected to stop being a carbon dioxide sink and become a source of greenhouse gases if seawater temperatures rose by 4-5C.

“It represents a test of our capacity as scientists, and as societies to respond to abrupt climate change,” Professor Duarte said.

“We need to stop debating the existence of tipping points in the Arctic and start managing the reality of dangerous climate change.

“We argue that tipping points do not have to be points of no return.

“Several tipping points, such as the loss of summer sea ice, may be reversible in principle − although hard in practice.

“However, should these changes involve extinction of key species − such as polar bears, walruses, ice-dependent seals and more than 1000 species of ice algae − the changes could represent a point of no return.

“Confusion distracts attention from the urgent need to focus on developing early warning indicators of abrupt climate change, address its human causes and rebuild resilience in climate, ecosystems and communities.”

 
Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/arctic-climate-change-to-spark-domino-effect-20120130-1qpgv.html#ixzz1lKAY34zk

 

The Polar Bears are bearing the brunt of climate change

Thin ice jeopardizes polar bears in Manitoba

CBC News | Eye on the Arctic | Jan 08, 2012

Hundreds of polar bears in northeastern Manitoba may face an increased risk of starvation due to delayed ice formation along the western coast of Hudson Bay, conservationists say.

Higher-than-normal temperatures have prevented ice from forming in the region, putting it three to four weeks behind schedule, according to the Canadian Ice Service, a division of Environment Canada. As a result, minimum ice cover there is the lowest since 1971, Canadian Ice Service forecaster Luc Desjardins said.

Formation of sea ice is critical for polar bears, which use it as a platform for catching seals and other marine mammals.

While a recent aerial survey of 333 polar bears along the bay’s western coast showed the bears to be in good condition, conservationists worry the animals’ health will deteriorate quickly if ice does not form in the next few weeks.

“The conditions that are occurring are indicative of the ice coverage that we would see probably in the mid-October time frame, rather than the mid-November,” Desjardins told CBC News last month.

Normally by late November, a thin layer of ice up to 15 miles long would have formed, stretching seaward from the bay’s western and southern coastlines, he said.

“The ice is almost non-existent this year, compared to our long-term normal,” Desjardins said.

Where there is ice, “it’s very patchy in terms of formation and it’s not a distinct pattern that affects the entire length of the coast of Hudson Bay.”

Desjardins stressed that the amount of ice has fluctuated in recent years and 2010 levels are not “significantly different” from those of the last five or six years.

What is different, however, is temperature: the region’s air temperature is “consistently warmer” than in recent years, he said.

In Nunavut’s Foxe Basin, the temperature is 14 degrees above normal.

Winter is the polar bear’s feasting season. From November until early summer, they fatten themselves on ringed seals, bearded seals and other mammals. In the summer, during what’s called a “walking hibernation,” the average polar bear loses 1.6 kilograms of weight per day.

Ideally, the slow, heavy predators have enough weight by the end of the summer to make it back onto the ice platforms and hunt anew for fatty mammals.

“The longer that ice is in forming, the longer the polar bears have to survive on the fat reserves they put down in the spring and conserved right through the summer,” said Peter Ewin, an Arctic specialist for the World Wildlife Fund.

“The later it gets, the more weak bears there are who probably aren’t going to make it through,” he said.

On Nov. 17, Manitoba Conservation, along with the WWF, Polar Bears International, and York Factory First Nation Resource Management Board, conducted an aerial survey of 333 polar bears along Hudson Bay’s western coast. The bears had been off the ice since July 15.

The results were “surprisingly pleasant,” said Darryll Hedman, a regional wildlife manager for the provincial agency.

Many of the mostly single, adult males were relatively fat, with “wide rear ends” and a belly “with a dish to it,” Hedman said. Cubs were also considered to be doing well, based on how their fat rippled when they ran.

“As far as I’m concerned, the condition of the bears that we’ve seen in the last couple of days, they’re doing OK,” he said. “The condition of them was good.”

Hedman emphasized the aerial survey was “just a snapshot in time” and warned the bears will become “exponentially skinnier.”

“As time goes on, and the ice doesn’t come in, they’re going to be getting hungrier and hungrier,” he said.

Desjardins, Hedman and Ewin all agree the ice will come, eventually.

“Hudson Bay will freeze over this winter, there’s no doubt in my mind,” said ice expert Desjardins.

This story is posted on Alaska Dispatch as part of Eye on the Arctic, a collaborative partnership between public and private circumpolar media organizations.

Thank You Pew Environment Group!

Canada’s Boreal Forest: The Year in Review

Boreal Map

Learn more about Pew’s work to conserve Canada’s Boreal

In recognition of the importance of rapidly shrinking forests around the world, the United Nations (U.N.) proclaimed 2011 the International Year of Forests. According to the U.N., forests have completely disappeared in 25 countries, and 29 other nations have lost more than 90 percent of theirs.

The Canadian boreal is the world’s largest intact forest. At 1.2 billion acres, it rivals the Amazon in size and ecological importance; harbors half of the world’s large lakes, a third of its peat lands, and a quarter of its wetlands; and serves as a critical buffer against global climate change. But the natural resources of this great frontier are under increasing pressure from logging, mining, oil and gas, and hydropower interests, with 180 million acres (728,000 square kilometers) already taken by industry. Conservation must outpace development if Canada’s boreal forest is to remain healthy.

Governments, scientists, and conservation groups are taking important steps to protect the boreal and to showcase its importance. Learn about five developments from 2011.


1. Historic Land Conservation Plan for Quebec’s Boreal Announced

Temiscamie River in northern Quebec

On May 9, Quebec Premier Jean Charest released “Plan Nord,” a 25-year policy for Quebec’s boreal region. The plan would protect half of the province’s boreal territory (an area about the size of Texas) from industrial activity and apply sustainable development standards to the remaining land.


2. Boreal Forest Houses World’s Largest Water Source, Report Finds

Lake in the Taku region of northern British Columbia

first-of-its-kind report by the Pew Environment Group revealed that Canada’s boreal forest holds more unfrozen fresh water than any other ecosystem and contains 25 percent of the world’s wetlands.


3. Boreal Forest Showcased at Google Earth Canada Launch

 

In just three minutes, participants at September’s Google Earth Outreach Canada launch in Vancouver got a nonstop, coast-to-coast, interactive experience with the Earth’s “green halo,” the boreal forest. The Pew Environment Group tour lets anyone with a computer hover over the vast northern forests and waterways to learn about the unique ecosystem.


4. Royal Canadian Mint Releases Coin Featuring Boreal Forest

Boreal Coin

In November, the Royal Canadian Mint unveiled a $2 coin honoring the boreal, and it’s clear that this forest’s worth stacks up. Canada’s boreal contributes an estimated $700 billion to the economy annually and is home to some of the world’s largest populations of migratory birds and important mammals.


5. Scientists Call for Woodland Caribou Protections

Woodland caribou

The population of woodland caribou, once abundant throughout much of mainland Canada and the northern United States, has declined significantly in recent decades. In response, the International Boreal Conservation Science Panel published a document, “Keeping Woodland Caribou in the Boreal Forest: Big Challenge, Immense Opportunity,” as a guide for conserving woodland caribou over the long term.


Contact:
Elyssa Rosen, 775.224.7497
Campaigns:
International Boreal Conservation Campaign
Topics:
Forests Protection
Region:
Canada

Ice Cellars Melting, Villages Sinking, Eroding Rivers

E-mail Print Tuesday, 03 January 2012 12:28 Written by Alex DeMarban, Alaska Dispatch


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Photo: Michael Brubaker. Alaska Dispatch.
Photo: Michael Brubaker. Alaska Dispatch.

The permafrost has sunk so much in one Northwest Alaska village that bridges are shifting, outdoor stairways hang over the ground and sagging water pipes are prone to break and freeze.

Those are a few of the ways climate change is affecting life in the Inupiat village of Selawik, according to the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium’s Center for Climate and Health.

“You essentially have the Venice of Northwest Alaska, where the whole community is gradually sinking and people are struggling with how they’ll possibly fix all this,” said Michael Brubaker, with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium.

Brubaker runs the center, which is studying the effects of climate change on facilities and people in Northwest Alaska. The consortium plans to turn its attention next to Bristol Bay villages in Southwest Alaska.

Village evaluates home damage

The effects of a changing climate are widespread in Selawik, some 70 miles southeast of Kotzebue. The village has 180 homes and it seems each has suffered one problem or another related to unstable tundra, said Carrie Skin, the city bookkeeper.

Windows are cracking. Doors are jamming. Ceilings are breaking loose from joists.

Stand a distance from her house and you’ll notice it’s not level. One side “lops toward the Selawik River,” which is five feet away and coming closer as it erodes, she said.

Skin signed up with the tribal housing department to have her house leveled, but that won’t happen any time soon. The list for leveling work is long and tribal funds are limited.

“You have to be very lucky to be the chosen one,” she said.

At her mother’s house elsewhere in the village, the earth has shrunk away. Steps to the front door had to be extended in order to reach the ground, Skin said.

Several Alaskan villages affected

Selawik isn’t alone in its efforts to grapple with climate change. In numerous trips to five Northwest Alaska communities over the last year and a half, Brubaker reports finding warmer temperatures are changing life in the Arctic, and often not for the better.

Snowmachiners are increasingly at risk of plunging through ice. Chunks of shoreline are crashing away. Electric poles are leaning. Boardwalks are breaking. And water plants are struggling with algae blooms and increased sediment from erosion, raising questions about how villages will pay for such problems.

The reports released by the consortium are unique because of Alaska’s position on the leading edge of climate change, and the impacts to the state’s most remote communities are rarely studied.

“Everywhere we go, we’re identifying big impacts to infrastructure, quite often in places that haven’t been talked about before,” Brubaker said.

So far, the consortium has published extensive findings on four villages. Some brief highlights from each include:

  • In Point Hope, underground ice cellars carved out of the permafrost are melting and filling with water. Meat has spoiled as a result, leading to more stomach infections from botulism, salmonella, and E. coli.
  • In Kivalina, erosion at a leach field in 2004 contributed to frozen water pipes at the washateria, the town water source. Nearly the entire village lacks running water, so residents were forced to melt ice to take sponge baths and wash hands through the winter. Health aides reported more respiratory and skin diseases during the shut-down.
  • In Noatak, dwindling water in the river has for years prevented barge deliveries. Freight must be flown in, boosting the price of groceries and other products, including fuel, which cost around $9 a gallon this spring.
  • In Kiana, the riverbanks are rapidly eroding. Four feet vanished last year. “At the current rate, houses and infrastructure located on the bluffs will be vulnerable to damage and landslide over the next decade,” that community report notes.

The project to document climate change in Northwest Alaska won’t include all 11 communities in the region, Brubaker said. The effort was initially funded with a $250,000 grant from the Indian Health Service, and those funds have dwindled.

But statewide interest in the project is growing. The Bristol Bay Native Association, using a grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, has hired the center to study three villages.

Brubaker plans to rely on past studies by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers other groups to determine which villages he’ll study in Bristol Bay — the region has more than 20 — and to conclude which communities are most vulnerable to climate change.

The center also recently won a grant from the Environmental Protection Agency to train one villager in each of some 70 communities to serve as local climate-change observers starting next year.

Spotlight on Selawik

The report on Selawik, population 820, will be published in early 2012.

It will discuss problems including:

  • Selawik’s above-ground pipes are shifting as the ground freezes and thaws, creating breaks in the lines and forcing the utility to spend more money to keep the pipes warm.
  • Supports for two bridges are shifting and much of the ground underneath has eroded away. The bridges are either “sinking or jacking up out of the ground,” Brubaker can’t tell which.
  • Thinning ice has made snowmachine travel increasingly risky.

Over the last dozen years, at least five snowmachiners have died near the village after breaking through ice, according to reports. Two died on separate snowmachines during a single incident in 1999. Three others died during an incident in 2005 when a sled and snowmachine broke through ice.

Lake shorelines around the village are also severely eroding, especially at nearby Inland Lake, Skin said.

“It’s massive, huge chunks of the ground falling away,” she said.

As for the river near Skin’s house, the tribe hopes to win grants for an erosion-control project. Perhaps sandbags will stop it, said Tanya Ballot, tribal administrator.

Skin isn’t hopeful. The river has moved about 10 feet toward her house in the last three decades, she said. Other erosion-control efforts, including old fuel drums along the banks, haven’t helped.

“My house is being jeopardized,” she said.

Contact Alex DeMarban at alex(at)alaskadispatch.com

Leave Arctic Oil in the Ground

The Oil That Comes in from the Cold
By Humberto Márquez

CARACAS, Dec 30, 2011 (IPS) – Thanks to soaring oil prices and new technology, oil producers in the hot sands of Arabia, the torrid Niger delta or the humid plains of the Orinoco are facing new competition from rivals in the frozen North.

The Anglo-Dutch Shell group was given the green light by the U.S. environmental agency to drill for oil off the coast of the northern edge of Alaska from July 2012, a project in which the company has already invested 3.5 billion dollars.

Meanwhile U.S. oil giant Exxon signed an agreement with Rosneft, Russia’s largest oil producer, to invest 3.2 billion dollars in exploring for oil and gas under the Kara sea, in northwest Russia. Another alliance, between BP (British) and TNK (Russian), is regretting its failure to win this opportunity.

“Estimated reserves of 100 billion barrels of crude lie under the Arctic ocean, as much as in Iraq or Kuwait, as well as 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids (like propane and butane) and 80 trillion cubic feet of natural gas,” Kenneth Ramírez, an expert on geopolitics and oil issues at the Central University of Venezuela, told IPS.

The Danish island of Greenland has also called for bids for offshore oil exploration, and Exxon and the U.S.-based Chevron have been quick to express interest.

Conflict and cooperationThe alliances woven between Exxon and Rosneft, BP and TNK, or Total and Novatek long after the Cold War can only be explained, according to Mijares, by the fact that “global capitalism is…based on the control, production and burning of fuels, mainly oil.

“The current scenario reminds scholars of the situation in northern Italy during the Renaissance. There were gigantic powers, like the Holy Roman Empire, France, Spain, and the Papacy, and small powers such as Verona, Venice, Florence or Milan. It was a very unbalanced multipolar system,” the international relations expert said.

In those circumstances, “alliances did not guarantee anything, the pledged word was not worth much, and what mattered was to try to be very strong, because today’s ally might be tomorrow’s enemy, and vice versa. The world nowadays is going through a similar phase,” he said.

“Instead of a family like the Medici, we have oil companies, private entities that are capable of competing with states and that create a dynamic interaction between cooperation and conflict, such that political and economic actors can cooperate in one sector or geographic area, while in another they are in all-out conflict. This situation will not be unusual in the first half of the 21st century,” said Mijares.

Canada, for its part, has Arctic oil deposits to add to the tar sands in its western provinces, putting it among the countries with the world’s largest oil reserves. It also has the advantage of proximity to the largest market in the world, the U.S.

Between 13 and 20 percent of the undiscovered oil on the planet is under the Arctic ocean, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), most of it at accessible depths, which increases the likely profits if demand increases as expected and prices remain at or above 100 dollars a barrel.

“Economic growth in China and India, and above all OPEC policies, have paved the way for producers like Russia to exploit more of their reserves and compete with oil from tropical regions,” Víctor Mijares, a professor of international relations at Simón Bolívar University in Caracas, told IPS.

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela, produces about 30 billion of the 88 billion barrels a day of crude consumed worldwide, and supports the price of oil by cutting down on production when the market is over-supplied.

Exploring for oil under the Arctic ocean boosts the commitment of the global energy industry and the world economy to fossil fuels; reflects the strategies of traditional and emerging powers; and demonstrates the persistence of environmental risks associated with the oil and gas industry.

Contradicting those who hold that oil supply is declining inexorably, Leonardo Maugeri, a top executive at Italian energy company ENI and author of the 2006 book “The Age of Oil: The Mythology, History, and Future of the World’s Most Controversial Resource”, proposed that the present level of proven crude reserves might expand substantially due to new finds and technologies that allow higher recovery from oil deposits.

Proven crude oil reserves stand today at 1.5 trillion barrels, enough to supply the world for 40 or 50 years, but it is estimated that barely one-third of the reserves can be recovered. However, according to Maugeri, technological advances will mean more than 50 percent of the known oil will be recoverable by 2030.

As new reserves are discovered every year, Maugeri estimates that there will be over four trillion barrels of recoverable oil by 2030, “more than enough” for the entire 21st century.

Brazil, for instance, could add 50 to 80 billion barrels to its 14 billion barrels of proven reserves, as a result of confirmed oil findings in the deep presalt layer in the Atlantic ocean.

The Arctic is a prime example: crude and gas were virtually impossible to extract because of the harsh conditions, but with the melting of polar ice accelerated by climate change, high energy prices and new technology, its energy resources have become more attractive.

The polar region may contain the equivalent of 400 billion barrels of oil, or 10 times the volume of all the crude extracted so far from the North Sea.

“The truth is, there is a lot of interest in continuing to extract crude, and that’s why the situation is not favourable for alternative energies, because oil is still abundant, convenient and cheap – even at current prices, it’s an affordable form of energy for most societies,” said Mijares.

The progressive melting of the Arctic icecap is also opening new shipping routes, handy for transporting the oil. “Russia is avid to relaunch itself as a great world power through the control of reserves, routes and supplies, while it makes the most of the technology provided by the West,” said the Central University of Venezuela’s Ramírez.

Mijares said that “in the era of the former Soviet Union, Russia displayed its power through its nuclear weapons and the Red Army…but now it depends on its energy capacity as the lever to maintain its place as a very important global actor.”

As for the United States, it is probably delighted with the diversification of fossil fuel sources, which reduces its dependence on Middle East oil, so that it can exert greater pressure on the domestic policies of oil-rich countries like Saudi Arabia.

The experts who spoke to IPS also remarked on the emergence of Canada as an energy power and, therefore, as a global player. It has withdrawn from the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, “and is increasing its military spending in order to stand up to the presence of new rivals in the Arctic.”

Meanwhile, further environmental effects are awaited. Scientists like Peter Wadhams of the Scott Polar Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, U.K., have warned how difficult, if not impossible, it would be to deal with a catastrophic oil spill in the Arctic like the one that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

“If there is serious oil spill under ice in the Arctic…it will be very much harder to deal with than a major spill in open water,” Wadhams told the British newspaper The Independent. “The oil is caught underneath the ice, so you can’t get at it immediately to clean it up or burn it off. You don’t know exactly where it is, and then it gets encapsulated in the new ice which grows underneath, so you then have a kind of oil sandwich inside the pack ice.

“And that’s being transported around the Arctic and isn’t released until spring, when it may be several hundred or even a thousand miles from the source of the spill…Once it is released in springtime, it’s very toxic, because the encapsulation in the ice preserves the oil from weathering…Not great for the environment. In fact, I think the appropriate word would be ‘terrible’.” (END)

Oil rig upset – Russian company

Four dead, 49 missing as Russian oil rig overturns off Sakhalin

Topic: Drilling rig accident in Sea of Okhotsk

The Kolskaya rig. Archive

The Kolskaya rig. Archive

© Photo OJSC Arktikmorneftegazrazvedka

14:13 18/12/2011
MOSCOW, December 18 (RIA Novosti)

At least four people have died and 49 are still missing after an oil rig overturned in the Sea of Okhotsk in the Russian Far East, the regional emergencies service reported on Sunday.

The Kolskaya drilling rig with 67 people aboard was being towed in a severe storm, when it overturned and sank some 200 km (125 miles) off Russia’s Sakhalin Island early on Sunday.

Fourteen people have been rescued, the emergencies service said.

Russia’s Transport Ministry told Prime news agency that “of the 67 people aboard the Kolskaya rig, 53 are crewmembers and 14 are workers and support staff.”

The drilling rig belongs to the Arktikmorneftegazrazvedka exploration company, which carried out work under a contract with energy giant Gazprom.

The drilling rig, which can take up to 102 people on board, was built in 1985 in Finland. The rig started its operations in September to drill and test the Pervoocherednaya well on the West-Kamchatka licensed block of the Okhotsk Sea shelf.

The rig, which is 69 meters long and 80 meters wide, was intended to drill a well at a depth of 3,500 meters.

A Gazprom spokesman said that the rig had fulfilled its works for Gazprom by the time of the accident and was heading for its base.

Investigators have said they are considering the rig’s tow in disregard of a severe storm as the most likely reason for the accident.

The regional emergencies service has said the accident poses no threat to the environment.

“Fuel stocks at the Kolskaya drilling rig are minimal and are stored in hermetically sealed tanks, and there is no danger of a fuel spill,” the service said.

Deadly Greenhouse Gas in Arctic?

Shock as retreat of Arctic sea ice releases deadly greenhouse gas

Russian research team astonished after finding ‘fountains’ of methane bubbling to surface

Suggested Topics

Dramatic and unprecedented plumes of methane – a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide – have been seen bubbling to the surface of the Arctic Ocean by scientists undertaking an extensive survey of the region.

The scale and volume of the methane release has astonished the head of the Russian research team who has been surveying the seabed of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf off northern Russia for nearly 20 years.

In an exclusive interview with The Independent, Igor Semiletov, of the Far Eastern branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said that he has never before witnessed the scale and force of the methane being released from beneath the Arctic seabed.

“Earlier we found torch-like structures like this but they were only tens of metres in diameter. This is the first time that we’ve found continuous, powerful and impressive seeping structures, more than 1,000 metres in diameter. It’s amazing,” Dr Semiletov said. “I was most impressed by the sheer scale and high density of the plumes. Over a relatively small area we found more than 100, but over a wider area there should be thousands of them.”

Scientists estimate that there are hundreds of millions of tonnes of methane gas locked away beneath the Arctic permafrost, which extends from the mainland into the seabed of the relatively shallow sea of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. One of the greatest fears is that with the disappearance of the Arctic sea-ice in summer, and rapidly rising temperatures across the entire region, which are already melting the Siberian permafrost, the trapped methane could be suddenly released into the atmosphere leading to rapid and severe climate change.

Dr Semiletov’s team published a study in 2010 estimating that the methane emissions from this region were about eight million tonnes a year, but the latest expedition suggests this is a significant underestimate of the phenomenon.

In late summer, the Russian research vessel Academician Lavrentiev conducted an extensive survey of about 10,000 square miles of sea off the East Siberian coast. Scientists deployed four highly sensitive instruments, both seismic and acoustic, to monitor the “fountains” or plumes of methane bubbles rising to the sea surface from beneath the seabed.

“In a very small area, less than 10,000 square miles, we have counted more than 100 fountains, or torch-like structures, bubbling through the water column and injected directly into the atmosphere from the seabed,” Dr Semiletov said. “We carried out checks at about 115 stationary points and discovered methane fields of a fantastic scale – I think on a scale not seen before. Some plumes were a kilometre or more wide and the emissions went directly into the atmosphere – the concentration was a hundred times higher than normal.”

Dr Semiletov released his findings for the first time last week at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

 

The Aurora Northern Lights over Arctic – earth’s energy field

AURORA WATCH: A solar wind stream is buffeting Earth’s magnetic field, causing mild geomagnetic disturbances and auroras around the Arctic Circle. “Last night, Dec. 12th, we went out to see the meteor shower, but the Moon was too bright,” says Helge Mortensen of Kvaløya, Norway. “Instead of Geminids, we got the Northern Lights.” Not a bad consolation prize:

The chances of auroras mixing with meteors will increase on Dec. 13/14 as the Geminid meteor shower intensifies and the solar wind continues to blow. Arctic photographers are encouraged to target the heavens on Tuesday night.

** Let us be reminded…that although they are beautiful to watch…our earth’s magnetic field is also our protection from Solar Streams and harmful radiation…We must ensure a strong earth field by reducing our emissions and ceasing to disturb the metals in our earth that are responsible for ensuring a strong magnetic field for us. **